Before I had kids but while pregnant with my first, I took a nephew I was babysitting to the park. There I was introduced to Parent Small Talk: the conversations temporary comrades-in-swing-pushing will strike up.

These conversations nearly always start the same way: “How old is s/he?”

If one comrade’s child is reasonably close in age to the other’s — or if there’s another connection, say a sibling of about the same age

A rose. OK, not. But is it any less beautiful?

A rose. OK, not. But is it any less beautiful?

- the next question is always: “What’s her/his name?”

With a rapport thus established, the conversation may veer in any number of directions, but the unspoken ground rule is that kids remain the subject. Parents almost never insert themselves into these chats, not even to introduce each other. Appalled at how these parents appeared to willingly surrender their identities, I returned from that park visit and vowed to my husband I would always ask other comrade swing-pushers their names.

Like most vows made in indignation, my commitment has waned. As my two kids entered daycare, I even accepted being greeted, “Hi, Owen’s mom.” Given my ambivalence over the “Mrs.” title and having a different last name than my first, it was just an easier way to deal with two- and three-year-olds.

But I hadn’t realized that I myself had adopted this habit until today, the last day of preschool. I’m the drop-off parent. Since school began last September, I’ve found myself on almost the exact same arrival schedule as two other dads. So greeting them has become part of the routine. Today, as I wished one a good summer, I was stunned to realize, I don’t know his name. He’s Will’s dad. After nine months of crossing paths twice weekly, that’s my only handle.

The other guy is Sam and Betsy’s dad. I did know his name once - we were also in swimming lessons together a couple years ago - but heck if I can remember it. I also thought he was a pharmacist, because I saw him wearing a pharmacy logo shirt back at the beginning of the year. Yesterday when we had a longer conversation, I found out he’s actually an accountant. Reality sends another perception reeling.

But when I think more about it, what further insight would their names give me?  Let’s call Will’s dad John and Sam and Betsy’s dad Joe. I already know John and Joe are good dads. John had a funny routine he used in the winter when peeling off Will’s layers — seeing the cooperation he got, I even cribbed a bit of it. Joe bikes with his kids like we have been lately. One day when Betsy was upset about something I saw him being very kind and tender to her.

Like me, at Christmas time, John thought he missed the opportunity to buy a teacher gift, and ‘fessed up, finding out he wasn’t too late, after all. Joe knows Owen’s name and says hello to him. They both seem to be good guys, doing their best with this whole parenting thing. Just like me.

Hard to admit though it is, maybe my lesson this school year is that in some roles, in some circumstances, names aren’t that integral to identity, after all.

PS - Good to be posting again after being MIA in May. I’ll have more to say about May at a later date.

Homage to the first married woman to keep her birth name

Comes this cute little T from the Lucy Stone League, which advocates for name choice equality in the spirit of Lucy Stone, the first American woman to keep her birth name after marriage, back in 1856. Get yours today and support a noble cause!

Haiku to Lucy Stone: Female pioneer/First to say: No way, hubby/dear. My name, it stays.

A friend sent me a link to this Salon story about a new study by Dutch researchers that shows that women who keep their last names after marriage — as opposed to taking a spouse’s or hyphenating - are judged as ” more independent, more ambitious, more intelligent, and more competent.” Those judgments translate into practice: Name-keepers are more likely to be hired for a job, and to earn more, almost $500,000 more over a working life.

If I was more cynical feminist, I’d pair this study with the one researchers at the universities of Indiana and Utah did last year in

Judgeth not, lest ye...oh, you know

Judge her not

which half of respondents saying the U.S. government should mandate name change at marriage (I’m still shuddering) and shout, “Aha! Now I’ve got you, patriarchal power structure! Make women change their names, squeeze their salaries over their lifetimes as a result, keep them dependent and quiet, and keep your comfy status quo!”

But I’m not that kind of a feminist.

On the face of it the Dutch study results endorse one of this blog’s aims - that more women choose to keep their birth names upon marriage. And I’m certainly glad it didn’t reveal the opposite. But my real, pie-in-the-sky goal, is to eliminate the judging that comes with women’s name choices. Why on God’s green earth IS it, as the study abstract says, that “studies show that women’s surnames are used as a cue for judgment”? Would studies ever show that men’s surnames are used as a cue for judgment? Sounds ridiculous, right?

It does because men (pausing to acknowledge the miniscule fraction who choose to hyphenate or adopt a wife’s last name) never have to deal with the question of name change, whether they marry or stay single. No change, no cue, no judgment.

So the only way to eliminate the judgment loops back to my original goal: Getting women to keep their birth names after marriage. A lot of women. And - the big step - getting women to pass their surnames on to their children in equal measure  to men. If we achieved name choice equality, if it really was equally likely that a child would bear a mother’s name as a father’s and then keep it for life, then there’s no basis for judgment.

When we get there, we really will have come a long way, baby.

More on this story: Harvard Business Review, NY Times, Salon.